CFP: Edith Wharton Review (deadline: on-going).
The Edith Wharton Review, a peer-reviewed, MLA-indexed journal is currently seeking submissions. The journal is committed to rigorous study not only of Edith Wharton, but on Wharton in the context of other authors, and on Wharton in relation to late-nineteenth and early twentieth-century culture more generally. It publishes traditional criticism, pedagogical scholarship, essays on archival materials, review essays, and book reviews. The Review aims to foster emerging scholars and new approaches to Wharton studies as well as established scholarly approaches.
On the occasion of its 30th anniversary, the journal now boasts a new design and vastly expanded content. Recent special issues include “_The Custom of the Country at 100″ and “Teaching Edith Wharton’s Late Fiction.” Opportunities exist to publish on Wharton’s lesser-known works, as well as her more canonical writings.
If you are interested in submitting, please contact Meredith Goldsmith, Editor (email@example.com). Submissions should be 20-25 pages, and prepared according to the _MLA Style Manual_.
In checking out the new Amazon book service, I recently looked at its competitors, including Scribd. I had looked at Scribd years ago when it seemed to be mostly bad term papers uploaded in impossible formats. Now it has real books.
When I looked up “naturalism in american literature” to see what criticism might be available, what should pop up but my page at the American Literature/Literary Movements site–but without my name attached.
If you’ve used my site, you know that the Naturalism page is one of the earliest things on the site (1998, give or take), although I’ve updated it. I wrote it and put it on the web for people to use. That’s why it’s there.
But stealing the content of the page without attribution and charging people to look at something I intended to be free on the web is really irritating–and also just plain wrong.
Stolen page: http://www.scribd.com/doc/201675150/Naturalism-in-American-Literature
Fortunately, you can report the DMCA violation to Scribd using this form:
It took me a little while to find the reporting link, so I’m posting it here in case it will help someone else with the same problem. We’ll see if anything happens once the false page is reported.
I’ve recently posted some older articles to academia.edu and to my own site. This is something for which the copyright issues can still be a little murky.
Elsevier made news last year when it sent takedown notices to scholars who had posted materials on academia.edu. I noticed that several senior scholars in the humanities had posted very recent journal articles to academia.edu, however.
- Some journals will not permit you to have the articles on your site without the payment of an open access fee, which, when I’ve checked it out, is often $3,000+ for a single article. That may be fine for the sciences, where grants can be had, but it’s an impossible fee for the humanities.
- Other journals will permit you to have an older article at your own site but not at academia.edu.
- Some allow you a “pre-refereed” version but not a version after it has been refereed and set in type. This seems to mean that you can post your manuscript, but since it will not have citable page numbers, your readers will still have to go to the journal site to read and cite your work.
- Others allow a “pre-print” version set in type.
- If a journal is published by a press that participates in Digital Commons, as the University of Nebraska Press does, then articles older than the most recent issue are freely available but have to reside at that site.
A useful site in this regard is Sherpa/Romeo at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php, which will tell you the policies of the journal. You can also contact the journal editors directly and get permission, of course, which is what I did with the Legacy articles.
It seems to me that anything that gets the word out on a book of essays or an article in a journal, especially if the article was published more than 2 years ago, would be beneficial for the journal or book as well as those who want to cite the work.
More issues of the Edith Wharton Review have been placed online. These issues and more are available from the “Back Issues” tab of the menu bar. http://edithwhartonsociety.wordpress.com/edith-wharton-review/ewr-back-issues-online/
I haven’t been posting much news here, but there’s news at the author society sites:
(via Nitrateville) The Library of Congress hosts a blog called The Sound of Silents: